This is designed to be the "visit" powder-or darn near to it- for nearly any bottle-necked cartridge 1 could handload. It can be the foundation for countless pet loads, nonetheless I have never been pleased with the outcome.
Certainly, the Hodgdon tech would not endorse my mixing of different whole lot numbers, but I feel I understand why. It is a litigation-driven earth, and a few fool would certainly deduce that he could blend H380 and H110 and come up with his own personalized blend of powder. What a globe.
The most obvious bring about is a rough/ruff bore. No volume of copper fouling lessening agents from the powder will almost certainly correct this.
I've experienced some rifles that fouled seriously negative. Acquiring each of the copper out was a real PIA until I discovered Wipe-Out foaming bore cleaner.
Novice to reloading. This will probably be employed for a 300wsm with 215 bergers. I used to be ready to get my palms on a few pounds of h4831.
Considering the fact that there isn't going to seem like any "official" Load Data in existence for this Load, can a few of you give a place to begin with this mix and issues to think about when working this Load up?
I'm making use of it with a 210 Berger. In my rifle, H1000 was not as accurate. RL22 did nicely but I was a little worried about temp steadiness. I do think I am at 72 grains and get around 2850ish h4831 vs h4831sc fps
excaliber said: I have identified the exact opposite to generally be accurate in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with one hundred eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a much faster and Similarly exact powder in my three hundred Acquire h4831sc load data Mag.
I have found the exact opposite being true in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with 180 g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably faster and Similarly precise powder in my three hundred Gain Mag.
locutus claimed: I however have an excellent stockpile of H450, the ball powder equivalent of 4831, which flows through my powder steps efficiently.
If there's no load data it can be because this powder just isn't appropriate for this cartridge. Ordinarily one is not going to uncover just one powder to suit all cartridges, as well as family of cartridges with the particular powder (4831SC) that you're asking about doesn't perform. Click to broaden...
I take advantage of 52 grs H4831sc that has a 117gr Hornady BTSP. It's accurate, mild mannered, and knocks whitetails down DRT. If it had been me, I might start at 52 gr and get the job done up.
Many of the previous Lyman data just detailed IMR 4831, which was surplus army powder and now more recent mfg as H4831.
I could stack em in one gap but I wasn’t pleased h4831sc with the velocity. Right after months, I got Blessed and caught some H1000 on the web and of course compensated somewhat additional. The pretty following week at a gun show a man experienced an entire circumstance of H1000 for $40 for every 1lb. I overlook how much, but Along with the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and it’s a mild load.